In March 2023, Silicon Valley Bank collapsed in the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history. The proximate cause: a massive portfolio of long-duration bonds that plummeted in value as the Federal Reserve aggressively raised interest rates. The bank had purchased billions in mortgage-backed securities and Treasury bonds when rates were near zero. When rates rose rapidly, those bonds lost over $15 billion in market value—losses that ultimately proved fatal when depositors fled.
The SVB collapse illustrates why duration matters. Duration quantifies a bond's sensitivity to interest rate changes, transforming what might seem like abstract rate movements into concrete dollar gains or losses. For fixed income investors, portfolio managers, and risk officers, duration is not merely an academic concept but an essential tool for understanding and managing interest rate exposure.
This article provides a comprehensive treatment of duration as used in professional fixed income analysis. We will develop the mathematical foundations of Macaulay and modified duration, demonstrate calculations with realistic bond examples, explore the relationship between duration and convexity, and examine practical applications in portfolio management and immunization strategies.
The Price-Yield Relationship
Before examining duration, we must understand the fundamental relationship it describes. Bond prices and yields move inversely: when interest rates rise, bond prices fall; when rates fall, prices rise. This relationship is not linear but convex, curving away from a straight-line approximation.
Consider why this inverse relationship exists. A bond's price equals the present value of its future cash flows—coupon payments and principal return—discounted at the prevailing market yield. When market yields increase, the discount rate rises, reducing the present value of each future cash flow. The bond must trade at a lower price to offer competitive returns. Conversely, falling yields increase present values, pushing prices higher.
Duration answers the critical question: for a given change in yields, how much will a bond's price change? It provides a single number that summarizes the bond's interest rate sensitivity, enabling comparisons across bonds with different coupons, maturities, and structures.
Macaulay Duration: The Time-Weighted Measure
Frederick Macaulay introduced duration in 1938 as a way to measure the "average" time until a bondholder receives the bond's cash flows. Macaulay duration calculates the weighted average time to receipt of a bond's cash flows, where the weights are the present values of each cash flow as a proportion of the bond's total price.
For a zero-coupon bond, Macaulay duration equals the time to maturity—there is only one cash flow, received at maturity, so the weighted average time is simply that maturity date. A 10-year zero-coupon bond has Macaulay duration of exactly 10 years.
For coupon-paying bonds, Macaulay duration is always less than maturity because coupon payments arrive before the final principal repayment, pulling the weighted average time forward. Higher coupons mean more cash flow arrives earlier, further reducing duration.
Example: Calculating Macaulay Duration
Consider a 3-year bond with 6% annual coupon, $1,000 face value, priced to yield 5%:
| Year (t) | Cash Flow | PV Factor (5%) | PV of CF | t × PV(CF) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $60 | 0.9524 | $57.14 | $57.14 |
| 2 | $60 | 0.9070 | $54.42 | $108.84 |
| 3 | $1,060 | 0.8638 | $915.63 | $2,746.89 |
| Total | $1,027.19 | $2,912.87 |
Despite a 3-year maturity, the weighted average time to receive cash flows is 2.84 years because coupons arrive in years 1 and 2.
Modified Duration: The Price Sensitivity Measure
While Macaulay duration has an intuitive interpretation as weighted average time, practitioners more commonly use modified duration, which directly estimates percentage price change for a given yield change.
For annual compounding, modified duration equals Macaulay duration divided by (1 + yield). For semi-annual compounding (standard for U.S. bonds), divide by (1 + yield/2).
Modified duration enables direct estimation of price changes:
The negative sign reflects the inverse price-yield relationship: positive yield changes produce negative price changes, and vice versa.
Example: Using Modified Duration
Continuing the previous example (Macaulay duration = 2.84 years, yield = 5%):
If yields increase by 50 basis points (0.50%), the estimated price change is:
On the $1,027.19 bond, this represents approximately $13.87 price decline to about $1,013.32.
Verification: Repricing at 5.50% yield gives actual price of $1,013.56—close to our duration-based estimate. The small difference reflects convexity effects we address later.
Factors Affecting Duration
Understanding what drives duration enables intuitive analysis without constant calculation. Four primary factors determine a bond's duration:
1. Time to Maturity
Longer maturity means more cash flows received further in the future, increasing duration. However, the relationship is not linear. For premium bonds (coupon > yield), duration eventually reaches a maximum and may even decline for very long maturities as the weight of distant cash flows plateaus.
| Maturity | Mod. Duration (5% coupon, 5% yield) | Mod. Duration (5% coupon, 8% yield) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 years | 4.33 | 4.10 |
| 10 years | 7.79 | 6.97 |
| 20 years | 12.46 | 10.29 |
| 30 years | 15.37 | 12.16 |
2. Coupon Rate
Higher coupons reduce duration because more cash flow arrives earlier in the bond's life. A 10% coupon bond has shorter duration than a 5% coupon bond with identical maturity and yield because more of the 10% bond's value comes from near-term coupon payments.
Zero-coupon bonds represent the extreme: with no intermediate payments, all value comes from the final principal payment, maximizing duration at exactly the maturity.
3. Yield Level
Higher yields reduce duration for two reasons. First, the denominator in the modified duration formula increases with yield. Second, higher discount rates reduce the present value of distant cash flows relative to near-term cash flows, shifting weight toward earlier payments.
This relationship means bond price sensitivity is not constant—it varies with the rate environment. Bonds become more sensitive to rate changes when rates are low, amplifying both gains from rate decreases and losses from rate increases.
4. Embedded Options
Callable bonds, putable bonds, and mortgage-backed securities have durations that depend on whether options are likely to be exercised. A callable bond's duration shortens as yields fall because the probability of early call increases. Effective duration, discussed below, captures these option effects.
Dollar Duration and DV01
While percentage price changes are useful for relative comparison, portfolio managers often need dollar amounts. Dollar duration translates modified duration into dollar terms:
The related concept DV01 (Dollar Value of 01, or "dollar value of one basis point") measures price change for a single basis point move:
Example: Portfolio Risk Calculation
A portfolio holds $50 million face value of bonds with modified duration 6.5, priced at 98% of par ($49 million market value).
Each basis point move in yields changes portfolio value by approximately $31,850. A 25 basis point rate increase would cost roughly $796,250.
Convexity: The Second-Order Effect
Duration provides a linear approximation of the price-yield relationship, but the actual relationship is curved (convex). For small yield changes, duration estimates are quite accurate. For larger moves, the linear approximation diverges from reality.
Convexity measures the curvature—how much the price-yield relationship deviates from the straight line predicted by duration. Mathematically, convexity is the second derivative of price with respect to yield, scaled by price.
Why Convexity Matters
Convexity is always positive for option-free bonds, and positive convexity benefits bondholders:
- When yields rise: Actual price falls less than duration predicts (convexity cushions losses)
- When yields fall: Actual price rises more than duration predicts (convexity enhances gains)
Two bonds with identical duration but different convexity will perform differently. The higher-convexity bond will outperform regardless of which direction rates move—it gains more in rallies and loses less in selloffs. This valuable asymmetry means investors pay a premium for convexity.
Example: Duration vs. Duration + Convexity Estimates
A 20-year, 5% coupon bond has modified duration 12.5 and convexity 200. Current price: $1,000. Compare estimates for a 200 basis point yield increase:
Duration-only estimate:
Duration + Convexity estimate:
The convexity adjustment recovers $40 of the estimated loss. For large rate moves, this adjustment becomes material.
Effective Duration for Bonds with Embedded Options
Macaulay and modified duration assume fixed cash flows. But callable bonds, putable bonds, and mortgage-backed securities have cash flows that change with interest rates. When rates fall, callable bonds may be redeemed early; when rates fall, mortgage prepayments accelerate. These option effects make traditional duration calculations unreliable.
Effective duration addresses this by measuring actual price sensitivity empirically:
Effective duration uses an option-pricing model to calculate what the bond price would be at higher and lower yield levels, then measures the average sensitivity. This approach captures how embedded options alter interest rate exposure.
Negative Convexity
Callable bonds and mortgage-backed securities exhibit negative convexity in certain rate environments. As rates fall and approach the coupon rate, the probability of call or prepayment increases, capping price appreciation. The bond's price-yield curve flattens or even inverts, creating negative convexity that harms bondholders—they participate fully in losses but have capped gains.
Practical Implication: Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) owned by banks like SVB exhibit significant negative convexity. As rates fell to historic lows in 2020-2021, MBS prices rose less than their durations suggested because of prepayment expectations. When rates then rose sharply in 2022-2023, the same securities fell more than expected as durations extended (extension risk). This asymmetric behavior amplified losses.
Portfolio Duration Management
Portfolio duration equals the market-value-weighted average of individual bond durations:
Duration Targeting
Active fixed income managers often set duration targets based on interest rate views. Expecting rates to fall? Extend duration to amplify gains. Expecting rates to rise? Shorten duration to reduce losses. The benchmark index duration provides a neutral reference point; deviations represent active rate bets.
Example: Duration Positioning
A portfolio manager benchmarked to an index with 5.5-year duration believes rates will decline. She extends portfolio duration to 6.3 years—an active duration bet of +0.8 years.
If rates fall 75 basis points:
The duration extension added 60 basis points of outperformance in this rate environment.
Immunization Strategies
Pension funds and insurance companies with defined future liabilities use duration matching to immunize against interest rate risk. By matching asset duration to liability duration, changes in interest rates affect both sides of the balance sheet equally, preserving the funded status.
Consider a pension fund owing $100 million in 10 years. The present value of this liability (at 5% discount rate) is about $61.4 million with duration of exactly 10 years. The fund can immunize by holding assets worth $61.4 million with duration of 10 years. If rates rise, liability present value falls—but asset value falls by the same amount. The funding surplus or deficit remains unchanged regardless of rate movements.
Perfect immunization requires periodic rebalancing as durations drift with time and rate changes. Cash flow matching (exactly matching asset maturities to liability timing) provides stronger protection but may sacrifice yield.
Duration in Practice: Industry Applications
Bank Asset-Liability Management
Banks face structural duration mismatch: assets (loans, securities) typically have longer duration than liabilities (deposits, short-term funding). This mismatch creates earnings volatility and capital risk when rates move sharply, as SVB discovered. Bank ALM teams monitor duration gaps and use hedging instruments to manage exposure.
Fixed Income ETFs and Mutual Funds
Bond funds publish duration in their fact sheets, enabling investors to compare rate sensitivity across funds. A "short-term bond fund" might have duration of 2-3 years; an "intermediate-term fund" 4-6 years; a "long-term fund" 10+ years. Investors can select duration exposure matching their rate views and risk tolerance.
Liability-Driven Investing (LDI)
Corporate pension plans and insurance companies use duration-matched strategies to reduce funding volatility. The 2022 UK gilt crisis illustrated risks of leveraged LDI strategies: when rates spiked, pension funds faced margin calls on interest rate swaps used to extend duration, forcing asset sales that further drove up yields.
Common Errors in Duration Analysis
Error 1: Treating Duration as Static
Duration changes continuously as yields move, time passes, and bonds approach maturity. Duration calculated today may not accurately represent sensitivity next month. Monitor and recalculate regularly.
Error 2: Ignoring Convexity for Large Rate Moves
Duration-only estimates become increasingly inaccurate as yield changes grow. For moves exceeding 50-100 basis points, convexity adjustments improve accuracy significantly.
Error 3: Using Macaulay Duration for Price Sensitivity
Macaulay duration measures weighted average time, not price sensitivity. Always use modified duration (or effective duration for bonds with options) when estimating price changes.
Error 4: Assuming Parallel Yield Curve Shifts
Duration assumes all yields change by the same amount across the curve. In practice, short and long rates often move differently (curve steepening or flattening). Key rate duration analysis addresses this by measuring sensitivity to specific maturity points.
Key Takeaways:
1. Duration quantifies bond price sensitivity to yield changes—essential for managing interest rate risk.
2. Modified duration directly estimates percentage price change: %ΔPrice ≈ -D_mod × Δy.
3. Higher maturity, lower coupons, and lower yields all increase duration (and therefore interest rate risk).
4. Convexity captures the curvature in the price-yield relationship; positive convexity benefits bondholders.
5. Bonds with embedded options require effective duration, which accounts for changing cash flows.
6. Portfolio duration enables aggregate risk management through duration targeting and immunization strategies.